CSIDB logo
Incident

JEV Plastic Surgery & Medical Aesthetics

Incident posture

Attack window
Apr 2021
Location
United States of America
Status
Historical
CIA posture
Available to members
Updated
2025-10-25 00:00

Linked entities

Victim
JEV Plastic Surgery & Medical Aesthetics
Threat actors
0 actors
Sources
1 source

Timeline

Occurred
Apr 2021
Discovered
Pending
Disclosed
Pending
Resolved
Pending

Summary

A malware incident at JEV Plastic Surgery & Medical Aesthetics potentially exposed sensitive patient information, including consultation notes, medical history, surgical operative notes, names, and dates of birth. The unauthorized access did not involve confirmed disclosures of threat actor identities or ransom demands, and the breach remained unlisted on ransomware leak sites or federal health breach reports at the time of disclosure. The organization notified affected individuals but provided no further details regarding the intrusion's scope or resolution.

Motives

Detailed motive labels are available to members.

3 motives

TTPs

Detailed technique labels are available to members.

2 techniques

Description

On or around April 30, 2021, JEV Plastic Surgery & Medical Aesthetics, LLC notified patients of a cybersecurity incident involving unauthorized access to its systems via malware. The breach exposed sensitive personal and medical information, including patient names, dates of birth, consultation notes, medical history documentation, and surgical operative notes. The organization did not publicly disclose the specific timeframe during which systems were compromised or the exact method of malware deployment. No details were provided regarding how the intrusion was detected, whether internal security teams identified anomalous activity or if external parties alerted the organization. The notice omitted critical information about the threat actors’ identity, including whether the incident involved ransomware operators or other malicious entities. Similarly, JEV Plastic Surgery did not confirm or deny receiving a ransom demand or making any payments to attackers.

The organization’s public notification constituted its primary documented response action, though the content lacked operational specifics about containment measures, system restoration processes, or forensic investigation methodologies. No evidence emerged at the time indicating that stolen data was published on ransomware leak sites or other criminal forums. The absence of the incident on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services’ breach reporting tool as of the notification date suggested either ongoing regulatory review or delayed public posting. Exposed medical details, particularly surgical notes and treatment histories, elevated potential risks for affected individuals beyond typical identity theft concerns, given the sensitive nature of cosmetic and medical procedures. The compromise of clinical documentation created additional privacy implications, as consultation notes often contain subjective assessments unrelated to purely demographic or financial data breaches.

Sources

Sources available to members: 1 source.

CSIDB