CSIDB logo
Incident

Scioto County

Incident posture

Attack window
Jan 2025
Location
United States of America
Status
Unknown
CIA posture
Available to members
Updated
2026-09-03 04:11

Linked entities

Victim
Scioto County
Threat actors
0 actors
Sources
1 source

Timeline

Occurred
Jan 2025
Discovered
Pending
Disclosed
Pending
Resolved
Pending

Summary

An Ohio county government experienced an external system breach when an unauthorized party accessed its network in late January, with the intrusion remaining undetected for several weeks before being discovered in mid-March. The incident compromised the personal information of 1,380 individuals, including one Maine resident, with acquired data likely combining names or personal identifiers with other sensitive details. Legal counsel notified affected parties through written communication, and the entity offered twelve months of credit monitoring and identity restoration services through Experian to mitigate potential harm.

Motives

Detailed motive labels are available to members.

1 motive

TTPs

Detailed technique labels are available to members.

1 technique

Description

Scioto County, Ohio, located at 602 7th Street in Portsmouth (ZIP 45662), experienced a data security incident involving an external system breach, classified as hacking. The breach occurred on January 24, 2025, and was discovered on March 14, 2025, indicating that the unauthorized activity remained undetected for approximately seven weeks before the county identified the compromise. The entity that submitted notification to the Maine Office of the Attorney General is classified as an "Other Government Entity," and the breach submission was filed on behalf of Scioto County by Matthew Meade, a Partner at the law firm Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, who served as legal counsel during the notification process. Meade's contact information, including a telephone number of (412) 566-6983 and an email address of [email protected], was provided as the official point of contact for the matter.

The breach affected a total of 1,380 individuals overall, including a single Maine resident, making it a multi-jurisdictional incident requiring notification under state data breach notification laws despite the minimal impact on Maine consumers specifically. The information acquired during the breach consisted of personal identifiers, specifically a name or other personal identifier used in combination with additional data, although the full extent of the compromised data elements beyond the general category was not specified in the public notification record. The nature of the attack being characterized as an "external system breach (hacking)" suggests that an external threat actor successfully gained unauthorized access to county systems, though the specific method of intrusion, the threat actor's identity, and the particular systems involved were not detailed in the available breach report.

Notification to affected individuals was provided in writing, with consumer notifications mailed on April 03, 2025, approximately three weeks after the breach was discovered and roughly two weeks before the notification was submitted to the Maine Attorney General's office on April 01, 2025. A copy of the notice sent to affected Maine residents was made available as "Scioto_County_4.3.25_L01.pdf" through the Maine AG's consumer protection portal, providing transparency into the language and content of the consumer-facing communication. No previous breach notifications within the preceding twelve months were reported by Scioto County, indicating that this incident represented a first-time reported breach event for the entity during that timeframe. The county also offered identity theft protection services to affected individuals, specifically providing twelve months of credit monitoring and identity restoration services through Experian, a recognized provider of consumer credit protection products. The breach did not trigger the requirement to notify consumer reporting agencies, as the threshold of one thousand affected Maine residents was not met, given that only one Maine resident was affected by the incident.

Sources

Sources available to members: 1 source.

CSIDB