CSIDB logo
Incident

Gino Group

Incident posture

Attack window
Apr 2021
Location
Italy
Status
Historical
CIA posture
Available to members
Updated
2025-10-25 00:00

Linked entities

Victim
Gino Group
Threat actors
0 actors
Sources
1 source

Timeline

Occurred
Apr 2021
Discovered
Pending
Disclosed
Pending
Resolved
Pending

Summary

A major Italian automotive dealership experienced a ransomware attack compromising its systems, prompting engagement of a specialized response firm to mitigate damage. The company, operating across multiple regions with thousands of annual vehicle deliveries and hundreds of employees, notified customers of unauthorized access by unknown threat actors. The breach impacted thousands of individuals nationally, though specific data types accessed were not disclosed in the notification. Operational disruptions and potential exposure of customer information were primary consequences of the incident.

Motives

Detailed motive labels are available to members.

2 motives

TTPs

Detailed technique labels are available to members.

1 technique

Description

On April 7, 2021, the Gino Group, a prominent Italian automotive dealership based in Cuneo, discovered a ransomware attack affecting its systems. The company promptly engaged a specialized external firm to address the breach and minimize damage. Gino Group notified thousands of customers across Italy via email, disclosing the attack by unknown hackers but omitting specifics about compromised data or encryption methods. The dealership, operating eight branches in Piedmont, Liguria, and Tuscany with 340 employees, reported annual revenues of €250 million and delivered over 10,000 vehicles annually for luxury brands including Mercedes-Benz, BMW, Mini, and Aston Martin. The attack disrupted normal business operations, though the duration and full technical scope remained unspecified in public communications.

The incident exposed customer data to potential unauthorized access, prompting the mass notification as a precautionary measure. Gino Group’s disclosure did not confirm whether data exfiltration occurred or if ransom demands were made. The company’s response prioritized containment through third-party expertise and transparency with affected parties, though no forensic findings or restoration timelines were shared publicly. As a major regional dealership handling sensitive customer transactions, the breach carried reputational and operational risks given the scale of vehicle deliveries and financial turnover. No further updates regarding attacker identification, data recovery, or regulatory repercussions were cited in the source material following the initial disclosure.

Sources

Sources available to members: 1 source.

CSIDB