hep global GmbH

Summary

A company experienced a cyberattack targeting its IT systems, prompting immediate containment measures including taking potentially affected systems offline, which temporarily limited certain services. The organization engaged external experts and authorities to investigate potential unauthorized data access while filing a criminal complaint against unknown perpetrators. It initiated transparency protocols by proactively informing stakeholders through its website and committed to providing updates as the forensic review progresses, though definitive conclusions regarding data compromise remained pending at the time of disclosure.

Motives

Detailed motive labels are available to members.

TTPs

Detailed technique labels are available to members.

Description

On June 5, 2023, hep global GmbH publicly disclosed a cybersecurity incident affecting its IT systems through a management statement published on its corporate website. The company reported that hackers had executed an attack against its infrastructure, aligning with broader cybersecurity trends observed across Germany where 90% of companies had experienced similar incidents according to Bitkom industry association data. Upon detecting the intrusion, hep global implemented immediate containment measures by taking all potentially compromised systems offline as a precautionary step. This defensive action resulted in temporary service disruptions, with certain functions and customer-facing services operating at reduced capacity during the outage period. The organization acknowledged uncertainty regarding whether threat actors successfully accessed sensitive data during the breach window but confirmed the activation of forensic investigation protocols through collaboration with external cybersecurity experts and law enforcement agencies.

hep global initiated formal legal proceedings by filing a criminal complaint against unidentified perpetrators while concurrently evaluating regulatory reporting obligations to data protection authorities based on investigation findings. The company prioritized transparent communication with stakeholders through its digital channels, explicitly citing commitments to operational openness as justification for the public disclosure despite incomplete forensic conclusions. Internal response efforts focused on system integrity verification and impact assessment procedures to determine the attack's operational and data compromise scope. Management committed to providing incremental updates to investors and interested parties as the investigation progressed, while maintaining standard customer support channels for breach-related inquiries throughout the remediation process. The organization's public statement emphasized protective measures undertaken to safeguard stakeholder interests but refrained from specifying technical details regarding attack vectors, compromised system types, or potential data categories under review.

Sources

Sources available to members: 1 source.