Menu
Browse

Cyber Incident Victim: Election systems in 21 US states

Date:

Jan 2016

Location:

United States of America

Summary

Russian hackers targeted election systems in 21 US states during the presidential campaign, as confirmed by a Department of Homeland Security official who did not identify the affected states due to confidentiality agreements. While there was no evidence of actual vote alteration, US intelligence agencies assessed the interference aimed to aid the winning candidate. Two states, Arizona and Illinois, publicly acknowledged breaches of their voter registration systems. Russian authorities denied involvement, and the administration dismissed allegations of collusion as unfounded. Officials maintained confidence in the resilience of voting infrastructure despite the targeting.

CIA Posture Motives Tactics, Techniques & Procedures
Available to members 2 motives 1 technique
Threat Actor Type Location
1 actor Available to members Available to members

Description

In June 2017, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) official Jeanette Manfra testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee that Russian hackers targeted election-related systems in 21 U.S. states during the 2016 presidential campaign. Manfra, serving as acting deputy undersecretary for cybersecurity, disclosed this finding during congressional hearings investigating alleged Russian interference in the election. She declined to identify the specific states affected, citing confidentiality agreements with state authorities. The targeting involved attempts to compromise election infrastructure, though DHS confirmed no evidence indicated actual vote tallies were altered or ballots manipulated. Arizona and Illinois had previously acknowledged breaches of their voter registration systems in 2016, with Illinois reporting unauthorized access to 90,000 voter records. U.S. intelligence agencies assessed that Moscow's interference aimed to assist Donald Trump's electoral victory, though the exact methods beyond system targeting remained unspecified in the testimony.

Cyber Incident Image

The disclosure prompted immediate political reactions, with Senator Mark Warner criticizing the decision to withhold state identities as counterproductive to election security improvements. DHS maintained confidence in the resilience of U.S. voting systems despite the breaches, emphasizing the decentralized nature of election administration as a protective factor. The Kremlin consistently denied involvement in election-related cyber operations, while President Trump dismissed allegations of Russian collusion as "fake news." White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer declined to clarify Trump's position on Russian interference during a June 20 briefing, stating he hadn't discussed the matter directly with the president. The incident highlighted tensions between federal transparency and state confidentiality agreements, with no additional states beyond Arizona and Illinois publicly confirming compromises at the time of the testimony.

Sources
Sources available to members
1 source