Cyber Incident Victim: Lubbock Cardiology Clinic
Date:
Feb 2026
Location:
United States of America
Summary
Lansing Community College experienced a data breach that exposed personal information including names, addresses, dates of birth, driver’s license details and Social Security numbers. The breach was discovered several days after it occurred, and a third‑party security team confirmed unauthorized access. The college notified affected individuals about a week after discovery, stating that not all records contained the same data elements and that there was no evidence of information removal or misuse. According to the Office of the Maine Attorney General, approximately 174,000 individuals were impacted, and the institution is offering them two years of free credit monitoring and identity protection services.
| CIA Posture | Motives | Tactics, Techniques & Procedures |
|---|---|---|
| Available to members | 0 motives | 0 techniques |
| Threat Actors | Type | Location |
|---|---|---|
| 0 actors | Available to members | Available to members |
Description
The provided source material includes two news articles dated June 9, 2026, that report on a data breach at Lansing Community College. The articles state that the breach occurred on February 12 and was discovered on February 18, 2026. They note that a third‑party security team found hackers had accessed names, addresses, dates of birth, driver’s license details, and Social Security numbers. The breach impacted 174,307 individuals according to the Office of the Maine Attorney General. Lansing Community College notified affected individuals about one week after discovery and offered 24 months of free credit monitoring. No mention of Lubbock Cardiology Clinic appears in either article.
Because the source evidence does not contain any details about Lubbock Cardiology Clinic, a factual chronology of an incident involving that organization cannot be constructed. Similarly, there is no information on what data may have been compromised, how the breach was detected, or what response actions were taken. Any attempt to describe impacts, attacker behavior, or mitigation steps for Lubbock Cardiology Clinic would rely on speculation rather than the provided evidence. The instructions prohibit fabricating specifics or offering analyst opinion when source material is lacking. Therefore, the only accurate statement possible is that no incident details for Lubbock Cardiology Clinic are available in the given material. This concludes the factual account based solely on the supplied sources.