Cyber Incident Victim: Gateway Ambulatory Surgery Center
Date:
Feb 2022
Location:
United States of America
Summary
Gateway Ambulatory Surgery Center experienced a cybersecurity incident involving a phishing attack that resulted in unauthorized access to sensitive patient information. The breach led to the exposure of personal health data, compromising patient confidentiality and necessitating disclosure under regulatory requirements. The incident underscores vulnerabilities associated with targeted email-based threats in healthcare environments.
| CIA Posture | Motives | Tactics, Techniques & Procedures |
|---|---|---|
| Available to members | 1 motive | 2 techniques |
| Threat Actors | Type | Location |
|---|---|---|
| 0 actors | Available to members | Available to members |
Description
Gateway Ambulatory Surgery Center experienced a cybersecurity incident involving unauthorized access to patient data following a phishing attack discovered on or around February 14, 2022. The breach resulted in the exposure of sensitive patient information, though specific details regarding the number of affected individuals or the exact types of compromised data were not disclosed in available public reporting. The attack vector was identified as a phishing scheme, a common method where attackers deceive recipients into revealing credentials or granting system access through fraudulent communications. No further technical specifics about the attackers’ tactics, such as malware deployment or lateral movement within systems, were confirmed in the source material. The center acknowledged the incident but did not publicly elaborate on the timeline between initial detection, containment actions, or forensic investigation methodologies.

The surgery center formally reported the data leak in a public notice dated May 10, 2022, over two months after the incident’s discovery. This disclosure confirmed the breach but omitted operational details such as impacted IT systems, data restoration processes, or whether ransomware or data exfiltration occurred. The available source material from JD Supra lacked substantive technical or procedural content, focusing instead on peripheral webpage elements like subscription prompts rather than incident specifics. No information was provided regarding patient notifications, regulatory filings with agencies like HHS OCR, or post-incident security enhancements. The absence of documented patient impacts beyond the acknowledgment of data exposure leaves the full consequences of the incident undefined in public records.
