Menu
Browse

Cyber Incident Victim: Gingerbread Shed Corporation

Date:

Nov 2013

Location:

United States of America

Summary

An unauthorized individual accessed Gingerbread Shed Corporation's systems over a three-month period, potentially compromising approximately 50,000 transactions along with customer names, addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, payment card details, and website account credentials. The company initiated a forensic investigation upon discovery, notified law enforcement, and implemented enhanced security measures to prevent future incidents. All affected individuals received notifications regarding the breach.

CIA Posture Motives Tactics, Techniques & Procedures
Available to members 1 motive 2 techniques
Threat Actors Type Location
0 actors Available to members Available to members

Description

Gingerbread Shed Corporation, an Arizona-based entity, discovered in April 2014 that its systems had been accessed by an unauthorized individual over a three-month period spanning from late November 2013 to mid-February 2014. The intrusion potentially compromised approximately 50,000 customer transactions alongside other sensitive data. Exposed information included names, physical addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, payment card details, and website account credentials such as usernames and passwords. The breach remained undetected during its active phase, allowing the threat actor prolonged access to corporate systems containing transactional and customer records. The scale of impacted individuals directly correlated with the 50,000 transactions acknowledged by the company, though the full scope of non-transactional data exposure was not quantified in public disclosures. Forensic analysis confirmed the intrusion timeline and data categories at risk but did not publicly attribute the attack to specific threat actors or methodologies.

Cyber Incident Image

Upon identifying the breach in April 2014, Gingerbread Shed initiated a forensic investigation to determine the intrusion's scope and mechanisms. The company concurrently notified law enforcement agencies regarding the incident but did not disclose specific collaborating agencies. Remedial security measures were implemented to prevent recurrence, though technical specifics of these controls were not detailed in public statements. Impacted customers received direct notifications following forensic confirmation of compromised data types, fulfilling regulatory disclosure obligations. The California Attorney General's office published a sample consumer notification on May 5, 2014, corroborating the breach timeline and data elements involved. No additional information regarding financial losses, legal penalties, or long-term operational impacts was disclosed in available public records.

Sources
Sources available to members
1 source