CSIDB logo
Incident

Pickle Finance

Incident posture

Attack window
Nov 2020
Location
United States of America
Status
Historical
CIA posture
Available to members
Updated
2025-11-22 00:00

Linked entities

Victim
Pickle Finance
Threat actors
0 actors
Sources
1 source

Timeline

Occurred
Nov 2020
Discovered
Pending
Disclosed
Pending
Resolved
Pending

Summary

A DeFi protocol suffered a significant security breach resulting in the theft of approximately $20 million worth of DAI tokens. The attacker exploited a vulnerability in the project's DAI PickleJar smart contract by deploying a malicious jar and executing fraudulent swaps, deviating from the prevalent flash loan tactics observed in similar incidents. This manipulation led to substantial financial losses for users through compromised liquidity mining operations.

Motives

Detailed motive labels are available to members.

1 motive

TTPs

Detailed technique labels are available to members.

1 technique

Description

On or around November 22, 2020, the decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol Pickle Finance suffered a security breach resulting in the theft of approximately $20 million worth of DAI stablecoins from user funds. The attacker targeted a specific smart contract within Pickle Finance’s infrastructure known as the DAI PickleJar, which was designed to manage liquidity pools. Unlike many contemporaneous DeFi exploits that relied on flash loans to manipulate asset prices, this incident involved a novel method centered on manipulating swap mechanisms. The attacker deployed a malicious jar contract, a type of container for liquidity pool tokens, and executed fraudulent token swaps to illegitimately drain funds. This approach bypassed conventional security assumptions about flash loan dependencies in such attacks. The exploitation occurred through the insertion of counterfeit swap transactions that manipulated the protocol’s internal accounting mechanisms.

The theft represented a direct financial loss to Pickle Finance users whose assets were held in the compromised DAI PickleJar. The incident underscored vulnerabilities in smart contract design, particularly the risks associated with complex liquidity pool interactions and swap functionalities. No immediate details were disclosed regarding the timeline of detection, containment measures, or recovery efforts by the Pickle Finance team. The attacker’s choice to avoid flash loans distinguished this exploit from other high-profile DeFi breaches at the time, highlighting evolving attack vectors within the sector. The incident contributed to broader concerns about the security maturity of emerging DeFi protocols and their susceptibility to sophisticated contract manipulation.

Sources

Sources available to members: 1 source.

CSIDB