CSIDB logo
Incident

BitQuick

Incident posture

Attack window
Mar 2016
Location
United States of America
Status
Historical
CIA posture
Available to members
Updated
2025-12-11 00:00

Linked entities

Victim
BitQuick
Threat actors
0 actors
Sources
1 source

Timeline

Occurred
Mar 2016
Discovered
Pending
Disclosed
Pending
Resolved
Pending

Summary

A peer-to-peer trading platform experienced unauthorized administrative access during a security breach, prompting immediate server shutdown to prevent further compromise. An investigation was launched to identify the attack vector and assess potential data exposure, though the organization confirmed that no funds were stolen and all user identification documents and email communications remained secure due to existing protective measures. Following the incident, the platform publicly sought new ownership to resume operations under its established standards but later removed this statement from its official communication without explanation.

Motives

Detailed motive labels are available to members.

1 motive

TTPs

Detailed technique labels are available to members.

1 technique

Description

On or around March 18, 2016, BitQuick, a peer-to-peer cryptocurrency trading platform, experienced a security breach resulting in unauthorized administrative access to its systems. The company detected the intrusion immediately and responded by shutting down its server to contain further damage. BitQuick publicly confirmed that no customer funds were compromised during the incident, attributing this outcome to additional security measures protecting financial assets. The breach potentially exposed server data, though the company emphasized that sensitive customer information—including government-issued identification documents (driver's licenses, passports) and email communications—remained secured through unspecified protective mechanisms. A formal investigation was initiated to determine both the attack vector used by the threat actor and the specific scope of information accessed from the compromised server.

The operational impact included the complete cessation of BitQuick's services following the server shutdown. In their initial public statement, the company announced they were seeking "passionate and talented individuals or corporations to take ownership" of the platform, indicating a potential transfer of management or business sale. However, this statement was silently removed from BitQuick's communications within 24 hours, as observed by March 19, without public explanation. The incident's aftermath left the platform's operational future uncertain while forensic analysis continued. No evidence of data exfiltration or financial theft was disclosed, though the investigation remained ongoing at the time of reporting. Customer assets and sensitive documentation reportedly maintained integrity throughout the event due to layered security protocols.

Sources

Sources available to members: 1 source.

CSIDB