CSIDB logo
Incident

Wichita Urology Group

Incident posture

Attack window
Jan 2023
Location
United States of America
Status
Historical
CIA posture
Available to members
Updated
2025-10-15 00:00

Linked entities

Victim
Wichita Urology Group
Threat actors
0 actors
Sources
1 source

Timeline

Occurred
Jan 2023
Discovered
Pending
Disclosed
Pending
Resolved
Pending

Summary

Wichita Urology Group experienced unauthorized network access potentially exposing protected health information of 1,493 individuals, including names, prescription details, billing data, and health insurance information. Suspicious activity was detected shortly after the intrusion, with forensic analysis confirming no subsequent misuse of the compromised data; the organization subsequently implemented enhanced technical security measures to mitigate future risks.

Motives

Detailed motive labels are available to members.

1 motive

TTPs

Detailed technique labels are available to members.

1 technique

Description

On January 3, 2023, Wichita Urology Group in Kansas detected suspicious activity within its computer network. A forensic investigation determined that unauthorized individuals had gained access to the network the previous day, January 2, 2023. The investigation confirmed by January 26, 2023, that protected health information had been exposed during the intrusion. The compromised files contained patient names, prescription information, billing details, and health insurance information. The breach affected 1,493 individuals whose data was potentially viewed or exfiltrated by the attackers. No evidence emerged suggesting actual misuse of the exposed patient information following the incident. The intrusion did not disrupt clinical operations or affect electronic medical records systems based on available reports.

Wichita Urology Group notified all 1,493 affected individuals following confirmation of the data exposure. The organization implemented enhanced technical security measures to strengthen network defenses and prevent future unauthorized access. These measures were not detailed in public disclosures but focused on hardening systems against similar intrusion methods. No credit monitoring or identity protection services were mentioned as being offered to patients, distinguishing this response from other contemporaneous healthcare breaches. The incident was reported to federal regulators as required under HIPAA breach notification rules. Forensic investigators and cybersecurity teams contained the breach promptly after detection, limiting further data exposure beyond the initial compromise window.

Sources

Sources available to members: 1 source.

CSIDB