Menu
Browse
Date:

Mar 2022

Location:

Russia

Summary

Anonymous compromised the Russian communications regulator Roskomnadzor, exfiltrating and releasing 820 GB of internal data comprising over 360,000 operational files and HR databases. The leak reportedly exposed details of the agency's media monitoring and disinformation activities related to the Ukraine conflict, coinciding with heightened state censorship of platforms like Twitter and Facebook. An affiliated group, Ghostsec, separately claimed access to another governmental department. Pro-Russian actors asserted retaliation by disrupting an alleged Anonymous website, though the collective typically lacks a centralized online presence. The breach's authenticity faced verification challenges due to Russian-language documents and circulating unconfirmed reports.

CIA Posture Motives Tactics, Techniques & Procedures
Available to members 2 motives 1 technique
Threat Actors Type Location
2 actors Available to members Available to members

Description

On March 5, 2022, the hacktivist collective Anonymous announced it had successfully breached the Russian Federal Service for Supervision of Communications, Information Technology and Mass Media (Roskomnadzor), the government agency responsible for media censorship and disinformation control. The attackers exfiltrated and publicly released 820 GB of sensitive data from the agency’s systems. The leaked data comprised two primary categories: one containing over 360,000 files dated up to March 5, totaling 536.9 GB, and another containing 290.6 GB of human resources databases detailing internal procedures. Anonymous asserted the stolen material exposed Roskomnadzor’s role in orchestrating disinformation campaigns regarding Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Concurrently, Ghostsec, a group affiliated with Anonymous, claimed a separate intrusion against the Department of Information Projects (omk.ru), though specific details of this breach were not disclosed.

Cyber Incident Image

The incident occurred amid heightened tensions over Russia’s censorship of social media platforms like Twitter and Facebook, which authorities blocked to restrict dissemination of content depicting military actions in Ukraine. Anonymous framed the attack as retaliation against state-sponsored disinformation operations. Pro-Russia hacktivists subsequently asserted they had disrupted an alleged Anonymous website, though this claim was contradicted by reports that the collective maintains no centralized online presence. Verification of the leaked Roskomnadzor data’s authenticity faced challenges due to documents being in Russian and the volume of similar unverified claims circulating online. The breach represented one of the largest known data exposures of a Russian state entity during the early phase of the Ukraine conflict, highlighting cyber operations as a tool for disrupting government narratives.

Sources
Sources available to members
1 source